http://73520.com

「app推广方案」每一个在苹果的APP Store中通过申请的应用背后都有一篇血泪史

每一个在苹果的APP Store中通过申请的应用背后都有一篇血泪史

每一个在苹果的APP Store中通过申请的应用背后都有一篇血泪史

第一次反馈

账号问题、圆角按钮

May 11, 2012 05:53 PM. From Apple.

iDPLA 1.2
We found that the Seller and Artist names associated with your app does not reflect the name, “China Unicom,” in the app and/or its name and metadata.
To be appropriate for the App Store, your app must be published under a Seller name and Artist name that reflects China Unicom, as required by the iOS Developer Program License Agreement.
Section 1.2:
“You” and “Your” means and refers to the person(s) or legal entity (whether the company, organization, educational institution, or governmental agency, instrumentality, or department) using the Apple Software or otherwise exercising rights under this Agreement. For the sake of clarity, You may authorize contractors to develop Applications on Your behalf, but any such Applications must be submitted under Your developer account.
The Seller name is your Vendor Content Provider name in iTunes Connect. For information on how to address this issue, please contact Developer Program Support or by phone.
The Artist name is the Company name in iTunes Connect. For information on how to address this issue, please contactiTunes Connect Contact Us, by selecting “iTunes Connect Functionality Questions,” then, “General iTunes Connect Inquiry>,” and entering your request.
8.3
We found that your app includes a feature, or features, that mimic an iOS interface or behavior, which is not in compliance with the App Store Review Guidelines.
The rounded icons in one tab of your app are very similar to icons on iOS home screen. Please refer to the attached screenshot for additional information.
It would be appropriate to remove or revise these features to make them distinctly different from the iOS behaviors and interfaces to avoid causing user confusion. While the guideline specifies iPod interfaces, the spirit of the guideline includes all iOS interfaces and behaviors.

第二次反馈

问了三个问题

May 22, 2012 12:07 PM. From Apple.

We have begun the review of your app but aren’t able to continue because we need additional information about your app.
At your earliest opportunity, please review the following questions and provide as detailed information as you can in response. The more information you can provide upfront, the sooner we can complete your review.
Who are the customers of your app?

Where and how to receive VIP membership? What is the cost?
While your iTunes Connect Application State is displayed as Rejected, it is not necessary to upload a new binary. Once you reply to this message, we can proceed with your review.

我们的复原

May 22, 2012 11:46 PM. From Yakun Pang, pangyk@dascom.net.cn.

Who are the customers of your app?
Our customers are 3G users in ChongQing Unicom.
Where and how to receive VIP membership? What is the cost?
A 3G user will automatically become our VIP customers. According to diferent type of memberships and customer class, VIP customers are classified as prime card, diamond card, golden card and silver card, in order to provide corresponding service.
The Cost is free.

第三次反馈

措施在用户文档目次存储了PDF文件,违反了数据存储类型

May 25, 2012 01:44 PM. From Apple.

2.23
We found that your app does not follow the iOS Data Storage Guidelines, which is required per the App Store Review Guidelines.
In particular, we found that on launch and/or content download, your app stores 10.9MB. To check how much data your app is storing:
– Install and launch your app
– Go to Settings > iCloud > Storage & Backup > Manage Storage
– If necessary, tap “Show all apps”
– Check your app’s storage
The iOS Data Storage Guidelines indicate that only content that the user creates using your app, e.g., documents, new files, edits, etc., may be stored in the /Documents directory – and backed up by iCloud.
Temporary files used by your app should only be stored in the /tmp directory; please remember to delete the files stored in this location when the user exits the app.
Data that can be recreated but must persist for proper functioning of your app – or because customers expect it to be available for offline use – should be marked with the “do not back up” attribute. For NSURL objects, add the NSURLIsExcludedFromBackupKey attribute to prevent the corresponding file from being backed up. For CFURLRef objects, use the corresponding kCFURLIsExcludedFromBackupKey attribute.
For more information, please see Technical Q&A 1719: How do I prevent files from being backed up to iCloud and iTunes?.
It is necessary to revise your app to meet the requirements of the iOS Data Storage Guidelines.
For discrete code-level questions, you may wish to consult with Apple Developer Technical Support. Please be sure to:
– include the complete details of your rejection issues
– prepare any symbolicated crash logs, screenshots, and steps to reproduce the issues for when the DTS engineer follows up.
For information on how to symbolicate and read a crash log, please see Tech Note TN2151 Understanding and Analyzing iPhone OS Application Crash Reports.
If you have difficulty reproducing this issue, please try testing the workflow as described in <https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/qa/qa1764/>Testing Workflow with Xcode’s Archive feature”.

第四次反馈

说我们对用户有限制,申诉后通过

APP苹果审焦点途经程

苹果对开拓者提交的应用的审核之严格是出了名的,在提交申请之前,相识苹果的审核尺度对付开拓者防备应用被拒有着十分重要的意义。尽量开拓者在提交之前貌似都做好了筹备,可是你的筹备真的可以了吗?

每一个在苹果的APP Store中通过申请的应用背后都有一篇血泪史,追念三个月之前为了应用审核通过与苹果几个回合的唇枪舌箭,其间的曲折重复今天想来仍是唏嘘不已。在此就将其间的司理细细道来,以供列位IOS开拓者警惕。

我们申请的IOS应用是为重庆联通做的与其VIP客户相同的一款产物,在提交审核之前,先是以本身公司的身份申请了一个IDP,以此身份提交审核措施。提交一周后问题来了,直接被苹果拒掉,来由是我们不能以本身身份的IDP提交该措施的审核申请。楼主重复查察资料才知道,本来每每措施名中包括措施界面设计中涉及到“联通字样”“联通LOGO”“沃字样”等等的都要以运营商本身的IDP提交措施审核。坑爹啊,我们赶忙从头在重庆联通的IDP上提交申请。

苹果号称是一周的审核周期,即应用提交一周后会有反馈信息。公然,一周后苹果的反馈信息,忐忑的一周期待啊!功效我等来了神马啊,等来的又是拒绝啊,差点瓦解!对本身的措施是相当有自信的啊,又被拒绝了,无异于一把钝刀在割肉啊!颤颤巍巍的看了苹果的反馈。算是不大不小的一个失误,我说是失误,原因是苹果的审核法则也在时更时新,所以,亲爱的开拓者伴侣一按时时存眷他的最新法则。回到正题,苹果拒绝的来由是我们的应用违反了其法则中的第8.3条条款,即在措施里嵌入了圆角图标。知道原因后迅速接头出办理方案办理,从头提交应用,又进入焦虑地期待阶段

第二次申请提交完成后,历时一周,等来的是苹果方面的几个问题,苹果的审核员不清楚我们处事的用户谁,如何得到我们的用户,在此进程中需要投入几多。这些都是细节问题。其实不太清楚苹果审核员在审核一个措施进程中都要思量的这么全面,事已至此,审核完全停滞,只能尽快答复问题,在当天就对此举办了反馈,应用从头规复成In Review状态,继承焦虑期待。

题外话:这件事给我们的开导是:不要指望苹果的审核人员能大小靡遗地去探究你的App,人家一天要审核全球成千上万的应用,要让他们第一眼看到你的用途、用户群等。

好不容易又等了一个周期,等来的不是通过竟然又是拒绝,说实话,app刷榜,其时都是绝望了,怎么就这么崎岖呢,强挣扎看完他拒绝的来由,好吧,这次他又发明新的问题“措施在用户文档目次存储了PDF文件,违反了数据存储类型”。厥后我们查阅苹果的类型文档,发明晰实是有雷同条款划定,可是太容易被忽视。看来苹果对数据存储的要求相当严格。

又是一番修改,经此一事,不行制止的审核打算又延后了,说实话至此真是已经筋疲力尽了,感受看不到边了,尽量我们照旧坚信措施没问题了应该,可是这种不直接的相同方法,以及每次都是为期一周的审核周期已经在心理上给我们施以了庞大地压力。

尽量如此,修改完成今后的措施照旧迅速的提交审核,而且对他的最新条款举办了逐条的研究,没有发明问题,这次应该没问题了,我在心里这样催眠

一周今后,正好是一周之后,收到苹果的邮件及功效,其时间隔我们打算要宣布上线的时间已经整整迟了一个月的时间,可以想见我们其时期待的焦虑脸色。工作往往是这样,越渴望什么往往得不到什么,这次照旧拒绝。此处省略上千字表达其时脸色,已不肯回想。这次拒绝的来由是什么呢,苹果认为我们对用户举办了任意限制,这次的来由实在是让我们摸不到脑子了,几经接头之后,我们举办了申诉并对他的拒绝来由举办了表明,因为VIP客户端应用针对的是联通的用户,可是其实不须要登录才可以利用,未登录状态下,任何用户都可以利用8个成果中的6个。

在此之后的期待是最心急的,这次很不正常的不是一周就有复原了,等了整整21天,在此期间我们实验邮件,APP刷评论,实验申请加急审核流程,都未能顺利加速申请速度,最终终于通过。

总结其间的一些禁言教导,获得这篇血泪史,可是在抉择要提交审核时必然要留意:

1、 苹果的审核尺度极其严格(有些条款甚至严格到失常)。从产物筹谋、设计、开拓阶段就要去阅读存眷苹果专门的开拓者审核尺度,不然等提交审核今后再磨练尺度,极大大概呈现超出预期宣布时间的问题。到此时办理问题的本钱大大提高了。?所以相识苹果的审核尺度极其重要。

2、 假如对上架时间有严格的要求,一旦被拒绝,可以试着走一下苹果的加急审核流程,但必需有足够充实的来由(譬喻为了遇上某一时间点前的特定勾当,或是紧张修复bug)。凡是一个App只有一次走加急审核流程的时机,所以要用在很是须要的场所。利用加激流程后,审核的时间同样不行预期,快的时候越日就能完成(正常流程是8天阁下)。

3、 作为开拓者跟苹果周旋,必然要心田强大。

郑重声明:本文版权归原作者所有,转载文章仅为传播更多信息之目的,如作者信息标记有误,请第一时间联系我们修改或删除,多谢。